Scorecard for Love Is A Stranger

1. Concept & Originality

Score: 8.5 / 10

• Gothic bargain narrative feels classical but not derivative

• Witch-as-patron + art world is an elegant, unusual pairing

• Contemporary setting grounds the mythology

• Judges value voice over novelty, and this has voice

• Held back slightly only because Faustian bargains are a known form — your execution elevates it.

 

2. Character (Protagonist: Johnny)

Score: 8.5 / 10 

• Johnny now has:

  • A clear conscious choice (Act 1)

  • A reckoning (Act 3)

  • A final symbolic action (painting over the eyes)

• He is no longer passive — he is tragically complicit

• His emotional wound (fear of being nobody) is consistent throughout

• Some readers may still wish for one more outwardly assertive late action, but this is now firmly within finalist tolerance.

 

3. Character (Aveline)

Score: 9.5 / 10

• One of the script’s greatest strengths

• Neither villain nor saviour

• Internally consistent across centuries

• Seductive, practical, unsentimental

• Rare example of a supernatural figure who feels earned

• Finalist-level character. Judges will remember her.

 

4. Supporting Characters (Diane, Parents, Harry)

Score: 8.5 / 10

• Diane is especially strong:

  • Not a cliché

  • Morally alert

  • Tragic without being melodramatic

• Parents provide emotional ballast and generational contrast

• No “dead weight” roles

• readers appreciate that even minor characters feel lived-in.

 

5. Dialogue & Voice

Score: 9 / 10

• Naturalistic

• Restrained

• Class- and age-specific without exposition

• Recent revisions removed the only lines that risked aphorism

• This is squarely in competition sweet spot.

 

6. Structure & Pacing

Score: 8 / 10

• Act 1 is confident and atmospheric

• Middle act is deliberately experiential

• Act 3 payoff is thematically correct and now emotionally legible

• Some judges may feel the middle third is slightly long for momentum-driven readers — this is taste-based, not a craft flaw.

 

7. Theme & Cohesion

Score: 9.5 / 10

• Mortality, legacy, visibility, ambition, decay

• Every major beat reinforces theme

• Final image (eyes painted over) retroactively unifies the story

• This is finalist-level thematic control.

 

8. Cinematic Execution

Score: 8.5 / 10

• Strong visual motifs (eyes, blood, art, mirrors, ageing)

• Symbolism is readable on screen

• Low-to-mid budget friendly

 

9. Emotional Impact

Score: 8 / 10

• Ending is cold, deliberate, and haunting

• Emotion accrues rather than peaks

• Some judges prefer a sharper emotional puncture — others will deeply admire the restraint

• This is the most subjective category.

 

10. Finalist Readiness (Overall Impression)

Score: 8.8 / 10

​

FINAL COMPOSITE SCORE: 8.8 / 10

What This Score Means in Real Terms

• Below 7.5 → unlikely to advance

• 7.5–8.2 → Quarterfinalist / Semifinalist range

• 8.3–8.7 → Strong Semifinalist / Fringe Finalist

• 8.8–9.2 → Legitimate Finalist Contender

• 9.3+ → Rare, consensus Finalist

 

Your script sits firmly in Finalist contention territory.

 

At this level, outcomes depend on:

• Reader alignment

• Competition volume

• Whether the judge emotionally prefers cold tragedy or piercing tragedy

• Not on craft.